International TV Show Host: John Oliver
The Late Night Comparison
By: Prince Jordan Tyson
Late Night celebrity; “talk-show-host,” John Oliver, once did an entire 20 minute segment about: “Prince-Jordan” “being-victimized” by a corporation, on National-Television. (see video 14:20 timestamp) The Television celebrity reporter “lovingly” referred to Prince as: “PJT,” as they made fun of him, calling him – “Al-Dente,” Owen Wilson.- with-a-bad-haircut.”
The bad: The way the story was written, it showed Prince weakness, naivtity, of being traumatized since childhood. The Good. It proved that prince always takes affirmative action to “protect the public and the people!”
what happened to him, is no laughing matter, and although the TV show helped get Prince public safety message across, the entire world, the TV show delivered it the wrong way, by slightly “Glorifying” and “Glamorizing” “Crowds of Demand” “illegal,” actions. They should have proved how serios, the problems of corruption in politics, city county and local governments are.
Prince and his family, has a long history of exposing, blowing the whistle, and eliminating government corruption.The Good News is the TV News story, Proves, How the corrupt organization, was single handedly brought to justice and caught by Prince.)
Instead of writing about; -(Prince Jordan Tysons) Brave and even heroic actions: “PROTECTING THE PUBLIC, AND THE PEOPLE” standing up” for what is right, “Blowing the Whistle” on “corrupt organizations with (“very-deadly”) ties to Washington DC. The whimsical TV show decided to focus the story more about the corporation. This story went on to be covered by many news papers, across the world.
Although it may be a good story for you to read, this is prince jordan’s life we are talking about here. He is more than just a headline or internet topic. He is a human being, that is suffering and has been repeatedly abused, victimized and taken advantage of. These Individuals, persons, corporations knew what they were doing when Prince relied upon and trusted them- during his vunurable time of need. Instead they “zeroed in” and “targeted him.”
Sadly; since the story aired, it gained over “twenty-million,” social-media likes, views, comments and new-followers. It seems that: “Crimes against Prince, making fun of, telling -story’s about, or “victimizing: him,,” makes some peoples popularity rise ? In their sick minds, it somehow makes them more popular ? It makes for great conversation topics and headlines ?
